13 December 2012 NATO announced
that the Patriot PAC 3 batteries requested by Turkey on 30 November 2012 would
be honored. 2 Batteries from Germany, 2 Batteries
from Netherlands will be supplied. 14 December 2012 United Stated Department of
Defense announced that it would contribute 2 Batteries to the NATO mission to
Turkey (Deployed from Europe). It is expected that these batteries will be
operational at the end of January 2013.
In this case NATO is providing
1 enhanced ADA Battalion (Not America Disabilities Act)(Air Defense Artillery) (6 Batteries versus normal 4 Batteries), The United States to
provide 400 troops, German is providing approximately 400 troops and the
Netherlands is providing approximately 360 troops. Total initial troop commitment 1160
soldiers. All parties emphasized in
their respective announcements that unit will be under “NATO control”.
Wait it gets better as stated
in the NATO press release the unit will not be operational until the end of
January 2013. Hopefully this will be so
that the troops that are tagged with this deployment will be allowed to spend
this Christmas with their families. Glad
it is not that much of an emergency. On
a side note it is a clever way to extent the ballistic missile shield closer to
Iran, but I am sure that had nothing to do with the decision to forward deploy
this ADA Battalion.
Just how long are they going to
be forward deployed is the next question?
Will the troop elements be rotated out on a regular basis, so as to
spread the pain among the PAC-3 batteries in Europe?
Even with allowing the troops
to stay in Europe until after Christmas, the long deployment time for the
Battalion is a direct results of the fact that the various parts of the Patriot
system, namely the radar units, command and control centers, and communication
and support facilities (power generation) can not be transported by air to
Turkey they are either too big or too heavy, or too big and heavy, instead they
must be shipped by ground and ship.
It brings to mind the remarks I
heard from Retired Marine Corp General Cartwright in a conference where he
chided the various chief of the services, he chide the Army for being too heavy
and too big to move by air, and chided the Air Force for not being able to move
the heavy and or big, and not being able to move enough of it in a timely manner,
and finally the Navy for being able to move the big and heavy unfortunately
they are too slow to be considered a rapid reaction assets.
In this case NATO is providing
1 enhanced ADA, The United States to
provide 400 troops, German is providing approximately 400 troops and the
Netherlands is providing approximately 360 troops. Total initial troop commitment 1160
soldiers. All parties emphasized in
their respective announcements that unit will be under “NATO control” isn’t
that nice.
Turkey will supply the physical
security forces, and combat engineering support to ready the physical battery
sites. And it goes with out saying, but
I will say it anyway that the United States will fill in the holes, i.e. the logistics
train that will be required to support this forward deployment. The United States in all likelihood will be the
source of operational spares, since we have the deepest stores.
The 1160 troops associated with
the enhanced ADA battalion will require a large logistics train to support
it. Most of the operational support will
come out of Europe, another mission for the 21 Theater Sustainment Command. It takes a great deal of Food, Fuel, Fiber, Shelter,
Equipment, and Communications to support 1160 troops downrange. Lucky for us the natives are friendly, or the
footprint would have to be even larger.
NATO also announced that they
would be deploying AWAC assets to provide additional coverage for the area, the
commitment of another NATO critical asset.
Bad news there is limited maintenance support for this system in Turkey,
oh well what a few more trips back and forth between Turkey and Geilenkirchen
FRG, it is just a few tons of F-34/F-35 to make that trip.
Currently there are only 74 E-3
AWACS in the free world, NATO has 18 aircraft, France has 4, Saudi Arabia has
13, the United Kingdom has 7, and the United State 32 aircraft, with the
majority assigned to the 552nd Air Control Wing. At best 80 percent are available for
operations at any time, the rest are in maintenance cycle.
NATO had difficulties using
their own assets i.e. 18 AWAC to support their operations against Libya lucky
for the British, French, and the United States, mainly the United States. What will we see in NATO’s support of Turkey?
The PAC-3 Batteries are a
critical item for the Netherlands and Germany, given that Netherland only has
two Squadrons (Battalions) (8 -12 Batteries total), and Germany has 6
Battalions (24-36 Batteries total). The
assets are anything but common.
God only knows what this is
going to cost? God only knows who is
going to pay for it? But my bet is the
United State will pay for it either directly or indirectly via our funding of
NATO. It is unfortunate fact that the
world is an expensive place. Let the
sequestration begin.
No comments:
Post a Comment